----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 67baa989
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 05a771a5
@REPLYADDR Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Newyana2
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: -0400
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
"R.Wieser" <
address@is.invalid> wrote
| I would suggest you read that article again, both the subjectline(!) as
well
| as (the first line of) the second paragraph. It definitily *doesn`t* say
| they turn off HTML altogether.
|
I`m guessing he understood that. There`s still a potential
question (at least for worrywarts) whether Google`s
javascript razzmatazz UI with all the extra functions might
make Firefox choke.
Google could very well force people to
use Chrome in most scenarios. Chrome is already a monopoly
browser. When I tried to help a friend set up POP email
in TBird last year, for a college where she was working, the
young college tech support actually had no idea what TBird
or email protocol were. He couldn`t tell me what the POP,
IMAC, SMTP specs were for the server. He just told me
to use Chrome!
--- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441