----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 390cb743
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 67baa989
@REPLYADDR R.Wieser <address@is.invalid>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 R.Wieser
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: 0200
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Newyana2,
> | I would suggest you read that article again, both the subjectline(!)
> | as well as (the first line of) the second paragraph. It definitily
> | *doesn`t* say they turn off HTML altogether.
> |
> I`m guessing he understood that.
Thats not what I`m getting from the OPs post. Not by a long shot.
> There`s still a potential question (at least for worrywarts) whether
> Google`s javascript razzmatazz UI with all the extra functions might
> make Firefox choke.
Indeed. But thats something rather different than what the OPs wrote - or,
for that matter, what the link he supplied says.
> Google could very well force people to use Chrome in most scenarios.
Only for those "people" under us who cannot think of using anything else
than gmail. Which is, I would say, a "people" problem. :-)
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
--- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441