@MSGID: <knjbf7F2clkU1@mid.individual.net>
ffe0f95a
@REPLY: .dlg@v.nguard.lh> 45fed72c
@REPLYADDR Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Andy Burns
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<knjbf7F2clkU1@mid.individual.net>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<1v1xj1ef28u40.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <kni55eFr298U2@mid.individual.net> .dlg@v.nguard.lh>
@TZUTC: 0100
@PID: Mozilla Thunderbird
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
VanguardLH wrote:

> Andy Burns wrote:
> 
>> But it isn`t the "standard" webmail client they`re killing, it`s the
>> "basic" webmail client, that looks like something from the mid `90s
> 
> I wasn`t confused on that point. 

Not saying you were, possibly the O/P was.

>> <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/>
> 
> Need to login to see whatever page you were trying to show.

How many email systems *don`t* require you to authenticate?



--- Mozilla Thunderbird
 * Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441