----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 5dabeec9
@REPLY: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
055fb0c9
@REPLYADDR R.Wieser <address@is.invalid>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 R.Wieser
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 3@dont-email.me>
1@paganini.bofh.team>
@TZUTC: 0200
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Gunther F,
> 1. The OP quoted EXACTLY (verbatim!) what the article said.
True. Though his subjectline belies it. And that means we have a post
which even belies itself. And I don`t know about you, but I consider people
who are contradicting themselves as untrustworthy.
> 2. So for you to call it "lying" means you are a victim of your own bias.
Pray tell, which bias ? Using scary words in the hope nobody will challenge
you doesn`t quite work for me I`m afraid.
Also, making claims is easy, but without underbuilding them they are baked
air. Worth exactly nothing.
Furthermore, you either have - still - not read the subjectline of this
thread, or are lying to yourself and trying to force us to believe that lie
of yours. Which one is it ? Stupid, or maliciously manipulative ?
> 3. Besides - he gave you the URL to the article - which you didn`t read.
And you know that latter part.... how exactly ?
By making that claim, and the junk you added below it, you`re showing
yourself as a mud-slinger, claiming stuff you have no idea how, and do not
actually want to support.
> Worse - you say to test a future interface.
> Which won`t release for three months from now.
Do you know about the saying about the pot calling the kettle black ?
Thats you. You obviously have not read that link - or are unable comprehend
what it says.
I suggest you re-read that article. Than maybe, just maybe you will than
realize that the "basic HTML" and the "standard view" currently *both*
exist, but that the former will cease to do so.
IOW, you can *at this very moment* switch to "standard view" and have tree
months time to see if that works for you, and if not look for a replacement.
Perhaps even taking a *real* email account. :-)
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
--- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441