----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 63280a16
@REPLY: <uf22g8.k0g.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
a2ab8edc
@REPLYADDR Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Newyana2
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<i0scuj-o8j.ln1@paranoia.mcleod-schmidt.id.au> 1@dont-email.me>
<uf22g8.k0g.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
@TZUTC: -0400
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
"Frank Slootweg" <
this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote
| Yes, if you have no cellphone *and* are stupid, Google makes it `hard`
| to access email. (Translation: No, you don`t need a cellphone or a
| phonenumber and you need 2SV (*not* 2FA) only *once* (per device).)
|
I tried to access my brother`s gmail after he had
a stroke. It wouldn`t let me log in on my computer. It
wouldn`t accept a cellphone to authenticate because
it wasn`t his cellphone. I`d say that`s something
no one should have to put up with for a mode of
communication that carries virtually no security.
--- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441