@MSGID: .dlg@v.nguard.lh> 910fe6a7
@REPLY: 2@solani.org> 39d181e0
@REPLYADDR VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 VanguardLH
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: .dlg@v.nguard.lh>
@RFC-References: 1@dont-email.me>
1@paganini.bofh.team> <1kmlxyaovlvxt.dlg@v.nguard.lh> 2@dont-email.me>
<6mrt9xd00rd7.dlg@v.nguard.lh> 2@solani.org>
@TZUTC: -0500
@PID: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
J?rg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:

> Am 09.08.23 um 20:20 schrieb VanguardLH:
>> Doesn`t change that it`s a non-professional name for a Usenet provider.
> 
> Your personal opinion and not more.

And yours, too.  Thanks for the elucidation.
--- 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41
 * Origin: Usenet Elder (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441