@MSGID: <jl1u2ilpq5dm46fqhq7k63ng5d0qd9ej4a@4ax.com>
a0768c98
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 653b7883
@REPLYADDR The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 The Horny Goat
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<jl1u2ilpq5dm46fqhq7k63ng5d0qd9ej4a@4ax.com>
@RFC-References: 1@reader2.panix.com>
<878p2ip2o5tck5sfc7dumcm480doqhb2vo@4ax.com> 1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:18:24 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

>> Considering that the founders already considered having citizens
>> own "military grade" firearm, cannons, and private warships to be
>> perfectly acceptable, why not?
>
>Because that`s not entirely accurate.
>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/what-is-a-well-regulated-militia-no-less
-than-alexander-hamilton-defined-it-for-us/ar-AA19hoem?ocid=winpstoreapp&cvid=23
21bd92810342dea937d32103bc6903&ei=8
>
>via TinyURL: https://tinyurl.com/ydth6hbp
>
True - a privateer without a charter from a national government was
considered a pirate and depending on circumstances, the victims of the
privateer might well consider them pirates anyhow - the classic
example being how the Spaniards felt about Drake.
--- ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
 * Origin: Easynews - www.easynews.com (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 50/109 301/1 463/68 467/888 4500/1
5001/100 5005/49 5020/715 830 848
SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 4441 12000 5030/49 1081 5054/8
5064/56 5075/35 128 5083/1
SEEN-BY: 5083/444
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441