----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 5@dont-email.me> 2a65c7f6
@REPLY: 5@dont-email.me> 7dba3d9e
@REPLYADDR Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Ubiquitous
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 5@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 12@dont-email.me>
6@dont-email.me> 9@dont-email.me> 4@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 5@dont-email.me> 4@dont-email.me>
10@dont-email.me> 10@dont-email.me> 13@dont-email.me>
3@dont-email.me> 3@dont-email.me> 5@dont-email.me>
4@dont-email.me> 4@dont-email.me> <20220817-130737.276.0@news.giganews.com>
2@dont-email.me> 3@dont-email.me> 3@dont-email.me>
15@dont-email.me> 7@dont-email.me>
<jNidnZGCWq6I_vr-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> 2@dont-email.me> 8@dont-email.me>
5@dont-email.me> 4@dont-email.me> 3@dont-email.me>
2@dont-email.me> 5@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: -0400
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Yesterday was the ninth anniversary of the lynching of a police officer
named Darren Wilson. On the morning of August 9th, 2014, Wilson tried
to detain 18-year-old Michael Brown, who had just robbed a convenience
store and attacked the clerk.
That?s when, according to the Obama DOJ, ?Wilson and other witnesses
stated that Brown ? reached into [Wilson?s] SUV through the open
driver?s window and punched and grabbed Wilson.? Investigators made
that determination by observing ?bruising on Wilson?s jaw and scratches
on his neck, the presence of Brown?s DNA on Wilson?s collar, shirt, and
pants, and Wilson?s DNA on Brown?s palm.? Brown then tried to grab
Wilson?s gun; Wilson shot him; Brown ran away, then turned around and
charged at Wilson; and Wilson fatally shot Brown in self-defense.
The Obama DOJ did everything it could to find a way to charge Darren
Wilson, yet those were their conclusions. Wilson did nothing wrong,
much to the dismay of those who wished to sacrifice him on the altar of
racial justice. Despite media reports, not a single witness ever
claimed Brown said ?don?t shoot.? And all the witnesses who claimed
that Brown?s hands were in the air were either contradicted by the
evidence, or later recanted their testimony. Those are the factual
details. If you?re so inclined you can read the full DOJ report online.
What you can?t find online, however, is what happened to Darren Wilson.
His name is never mentioned in the media. It?s as if he never existed.
The handful of reports on Wilson in recent years suggest he?s living a
life of anonymity in the middle of nowhere, and that he?ll never be
able to work as a police officer again. His life was destroyed. Nobody
who defamed him as a racist killer ever apologized. Nobody who took
part in the destruction of an innocent man?s life was ever held
accountable.
In a country that cared about police officers, or the truth, that would
be a national scandal. But we don?t live in a country like that, so
instead, yesterday the only name you heard was Michael Brown. They
canonized him all over again. Here?s how one local news report talked
about the case:
https://youtu.be/WxukhWjA1iM
A ?ceremony to honor Michael Brown, the teenager shot and killed by a
police officer after a confrontation.? That?s how a ?news station? in
2023 is talking about a thug who attacked a store clerk, then tried to
kill a police officer. They don?t mention any of those facts we just
reviewed, because they?re inconvenient. Instead, the ?news station?
informs you that Brown?s body lay in the street for several hours after
the shooting, as if that?s somehow incriminating or even relevant. Of
course they leave out the fact that the mob made processing the crime
scene so difficult that Ferguson had to call in the SWAT team to
control the situation. They don?t mention all the lies that the
supposed ?witnesses? told the media, like the false claim that Michael
Brown had been shot in the back.
It wasn?t just one news station that decided to lie yesterday. They all
did it. Here?s how the local Fox station described what happened:
https://youtu.be/5-dTsi3S3g4
Again, without mentioning any details of what Michael Brown actually
did, we?re told that his case has something to do with ?police
brutality and injustice faced by African-Americans.? That intro was
followed by a sympathetic clip with Michael Brown?s family. Apparently
Darren Wilson?s family wasn?t available. Maybe they?re in hiding. We
really don?t know.
What we can say for sure is that there weren?t any memorial events
honoring Darren Wilson yesterday in St. Louis. Instead the city put on
a series of events celebrating the legacy of the thug who robbed stores
and attacked a police officer. Watch:
https://youtu.be/v00nMb2ucN4
Michael Brown ?Was shot and killed followed by a confrontation,? the
reporter tells us. Wow, there?s that word again. It was a
?confrontation.? It doesn?t imply any kind of fault by one side or the
other. It doesn?t tell you anything. It leaves you completely in the
dark, which is the exact opposite of what the news media is supposed to
do. They just want you to know that the community came together to
quote, ?honor Michael Brown?s life and legacy.? They don?t bother
explaining why Brown?s life and legacy deserve to be honored.
These so-called reporters know exactly what they?re doing. Anyone with
Google can prove it is a lie in about five seconds. But obviously, none
of these people can think for themselves. So the question becomes,
Where are they getting the idea to do it?
We know that the Obama administration benefited from lying about
Michael Brown all the way back in 2014, just as they benefited from
lying about Trayvon Martin and all the other race hoaxes. That?s why
the Obama DOJ investigated Ferguson?s police department (and many other
police departments), and claimed they must be racist because they pull
over more black people than white people. It didn?t matter to the DOJ
that Ferguson is an overwhelmingly black town; they just ran with that
reasoning, because they knew the city didn?t have the money or the PR
resources to fight them. In fact, when the city publicly announced that
it disagreed with the Obama DOJ?s ridiculous reasoning, the DOJ called
the city racist again, just for daring to challenge their narrative.
?You?re racist, and if you deny that you?re racist, then that?s just
more evidence you?re racist.? That?s basically what the DOJ said.
Again, the document is online if you want to read it.
But that still doesn?t answer the question of, ?why now?? Why is the
media still lying now about this shooting, even nine years later, when
everyone knows they?re lying?
It could be that they?re still taking orders from the Democratic Party,
which, somehow, has not given up on the lie. Squad bench warmer Cori
Bush (D-MO) tweeted yesterday, ?Today is the 9th anniversary of Mike
Brown?s killing. He would be alive today if the institutions of racism
and white supremacy were eradicated. He should be alive today. We will
never forget. We will continue to fight for justice and
accountability.? Ben Crump and various Left-wing groups said more or
less the same thing.
But it?s not just a couple of race-hustling lawyers and politicians
from Missouri who are lying about Michael Brown. The Biden
administration, at the highest levels, is also portraying Michael Brown
as a hero. This was the State Department?s new ?equity representative,?
speaking yesterday as Tony Blinken looked on:
the state department`s new `equity representative` just
eulogized violent thug Michael brown, with Tony blinker
looking on. impossible to overemphasize how their entire
movement is built on lies and repeating lies despite all
evidence. it`s not just cori bush and ben crump
pic.twitter.com/aL4fTVDFlO
? Gregg Re (@gregg_re) August 9, 2023
Well, that?s interesting. The State Department, which uses coordinated
disinformation campaigns to inspire color revolutions overseas ? with
the express goal of overthrowing foreign governments ? is now
deliberately lying about a police shooting in Ferguson, Missouri from
nine years ago. They?re telling you an ?unarmed black teenager? was
just murdered by a cop for no reason, nine years after that narrative
was completely and totally debunked.
Why are they doing that? They know exactly how destabilizing that lie
has been over the past decade. Take a look at this chart. It shows the
rate of violent crime in Ferguson over the past few decades. That?s the
red. It also shows you how many cases police solve in the city. That?s
the green. Notice any trends? It?s hard to miss. You see a big bump in
violent crime around 2014, when the U.S. government decided to pretend
that Michael Brown was a hero, while the number of violent crime cases
actually solved goes the other direction.
https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2023/08/Document55.png
You can find similar charts from every major city in America. In recent
years, police were either defunded or scared away. No cop wants to be
lynched for doing his job, after all. And so, predictably, cities got
much more dangerous. A lot of people died. And it started with the
Ferguson lie, which was the genesis of the modern BLM movement.
To the Left, all those deaths were collateral damage. They think it was
all worth it, because the rise of BLM meant more political power for
them. They recruited a mob of enforcers who could literally set entire
communities on fire with impunity, as a message to the rest of the
country. They were able to demonize local police departments, and
empower the FBI, which they controlled. And, for the corporations who
bankroll Democrats, the rise of BLM was also a welcome diversion from
rising populist sentiments in both parties.
The lying about Ferguson, in that sense, isn?t so remarkable. The State
Department and the Democratic Party are pushing for an internal
revolution here for the same reason they push for color revolutions
elsewhere. They want to tear down the system of government we have in
this country, and our rule of law and our traditions. And they want to
replace them with something very different ? something ?equitable,?
with them in charge.
So far, their strategy is working. It?s a perfect example of how the
Left plays the long game. They?ve obtained total narrative control.
Sure, their whole narrative was debunked, but what do they care?
They?ll just keep repeating the lie year after year after year until
eventually the other side gets tired of correcting it, and their
version makes it into the history books. It does make you question how
much of the stuff you find in history books can actually be trusted. If
Cori Bush and the State Department and the entire media and Democrat
Party can lie about something that we all remember, what happens when
there is nobody left who remembers it?
The unfortunate reality is that historical lies gain more power and
momentum as time goes on and we move further away from the event
they?re lying about. The truth, however, does not benefit from this
kind of distance. If anything, its road becomes much harder. And this
is exactly what the Left is counting on.
--
Let`s go Brandon!
--- WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848
1042 4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441