@MSGID: 1@reader2.panix.com> a31e5e8a
@REPLY:
<20230715180727.e036aad4a821c642f9cc6207@127.0.0.1> 56d42681
@REPLYADDR Dan Cross
<cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Dan Cross
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@reader2.panix.com>
@RFC-References:
<b4a02fa8-02ac-4cdd-bd36-a7c47bdef332n@googlegroups.com> 1@gioia.aioe.org>
<28b8bd15-01f5-4cae-8f13-99dd7e99bf8fn@googlegroups.com> <20230715180727.e036aad4a821c642f9cc6207@127.0.0.1>
@TZUTC: -0000
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
In article <20230715180727.e036aad4a821c642f9cc6207@127.0.0.1>,
Kerr-Mudd, John  wrote:
>On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 07:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
>"muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [snip]
>
>You`ll need that lokc to pretty hunbreakable; the 8088 could only address
>1M AFAIR ("but 640k is plenty").

Could we please stop feeding this troll?  Thanks.

- Dan C.

--- trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 * Origin: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441