----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@reader2.panix.com> 36859ab9
@REPLY:
<20230717190955.f4d83c1ac4a632dc17850785@127.0.0.1> 47ebf171
@REPLYADDR Dan Cross
<cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Dan Cross
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@reader2.panix.com>
@RFC-References:
<b4a02fa8-02ac-4cdd-bd36-a7c47bdef332n@googlegroups.com> <20230715180727.e036aad4a821c642f9cc6207@127.0.0.1>
1@reader2.panix.com> <20230717190955.f4d83c1ac4a632dc17850785@127.0.0.1>
@TZUTC: -0000
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
In article <20230717190955.f4d83c1ac4a632dc17850785@127.0.0.1>,
Kerr-Mudd, John
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:59:36 -0000 (UTC)
>cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wrote:
>
>> In article <20230715180727.e036aad4a821c642f9cc6207@127.0.0.1>,
>> Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
>> >On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 07:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> >"muta...@gmail.com" <mutazilah@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> [snip]
>> >
>> >You`ll need that lokc to pretty hunbreakable; the 8088 could only address
>oops, poor typing skills there!
>
>> >1M AFAIR ("but 640k is plenty").
>>
>> Could we please stop feeding this troll? Thanks.
>
>Me or him?
Him.
>mtua.. isn`t a troll, he just has craz^w unrealistic expectations of old
>hardware (as if that can be revived after his meltdown scenario; yet still
>worrying about PD status!)
I`d say all of that very much puts him in the category of
"troll."
>Anyway there`s hardly any traffic here these days.
That`s true, but consider that that may be because the group is
largely dominated by said troll.
- Dan C.
--- trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
* Origin: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441