----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <yvqldedonmsh.dlg@example1357.net>
311cbd37
@REPLY: <klrrs9F2kepU1@mid.individual.net>
7df631c7
@REPLYADDR mechanic <mechanic@example.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 mechanic
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<yvqldedonmsh.dlg@example1357.net>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<B92cnYbUzJC2x2X5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> 1@dont-email.me>
14@foxmccloud45.eternal-september.org> <klrrs9F2kepU1@mid.individual.net>
@TZUTC: 0100
@PID: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 10:40:24 -0700, Mike Easter wrote:
> Fox McCloud45 wrote:
>> Switching from a tightly-controlled Arch Linux installation to a
>> "bloated" Ubuntu Unity one feels weird but for some reason I
>> don`t dislike it. I may really be losing sanity.
>
> That`s an example of a DE `winning you over`.
>
> As far as I know, Ub is the `best` way to use Unity, just like LM
> or LMDE are the best ways to use Cinnamon DE, as those dev/s are
> the most `committed` to that DE.
>
> I will say that there are some other nice Cinnamons too :-) Not
> so many Unity/s.
One big advantage is that the `modern rewrite` of Unity actually
works with HiDPI displays, even on the text screens on login. Most
Linux distros are pritty hopeless faced with a high defn screen,
often citing a lack of funds/expert developers to cope with this
hardware.
Of course MSFT Windows copes fine too, but they have the resources.
--- 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441