@MSGID: <km17r8Ft2g6U1@mid.individual.net>
d720f464
@REPLY: <op.2ayk5dmqa3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net>
a471f497
@REPLYADDR Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mike Easter
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<km17r8Ft2g6U1@mid.individual.net>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<B92cnYbUzJC2x2X5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> 1@dont-email.me>
<O6OdnZ5bJfAXjmT5nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> m8Ke.58836@fx08.iad>
<GC6dnUc6pIPJn2b5nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <km0hp9Foth9U1@mid.individual.net>
<op.2ayk5dmqa3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
David W. Hodgins wrote:
> It does much
> more than just replace initd, and does so in consistent logical ways.

What is your `position` on the arguments completely separate from the 
init improvement; that many don`t like that systemd likes to take 
`control` of so many non-init responsibilities?

I guess the systemd idea is that just like init, if systemd can do it 
`better`, then that should be just fine.

However, it does make it progressively more difficult to `do without` 
systemd, since it is SO much more than an init.

-- 
Mike Easter
--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
 * Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441