@MSGID:
<1783468acdafcf8d$184$79441$565a1096@news.usenetexpress.com> 75034ec8
@REPLY: <km20nbF2b35U1@mid.individual.net>
f249f870
@REPLYADDR Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Nux Vomica
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<B92cnYbUzJC2x2X5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> 1@dont-email.me>
<O6OdnZ5bJfAXjmT5nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> m8Ke.58836@fx08.iad>
<GC6dnUc6pIPJn2b5nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <km0hp9Foth9U1@mid.individual.net> <op.2ayk5dmqa3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net>
<km17r8Ft2g6U1@mid.individual.net> <op.2ay5lggva3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net>
<km20nbF2b35U1@mid.individual.net>
@RFC-Message-Id:
<1783468acdafcf8d$184$79441$565a1096@news.usenetexpress.com>
@TZUTC: 0000
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:39:54 -0700, Mike Easter wrote:

> 
>> The glue between applications and the kernel (provides various 
>> interfaces that expose functionalities provided by the kernel)
> 
> ... and thus the `mission creep` that became so upsetting to anti-systemd.
> 

There never was any "mission creep."

The RedHat/IBM lackey Poettering had stated from the very outset that
systemd was/is intended to be the one-and-only interface between the
Linux kernel and user space.

Fortunately, after more than a DECADE, he and his cronies have failed
to achieve that goal. Note the great failure of their "bus1" initiative.

But the attempt will continue, and all those fools who support systemd
are complicit in this willful expropriation of GNU/Linux by a corporate
agenda.

  
--- FIDOGATE 5.12-ge4e8b94
 * Origin: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441