----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <kmmlurFcf4uU1@mid.individual.net>
62b75f56
@REPLY: i1yc.36141@fx15.iad>
0de125bd
@REPLYADDR Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mike Easter
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<kmmlurFcf4uU1@mid.individual.net>
@RFC-References: i1yc.28116@fx15.iad>
1@dont-email.me> i1yc.36141@fx15.iad>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Nic wrote:
> This simple usb device seems very small and sleek.
My recollection (which is very hazy on the USB part) is that I might
have never gotten a USB device to do faxes under the conditions I
wanted/ was testing/.
But, I do recall getting a USB modem to `work` for dialup connectivity
over POTS.
--
Mike Easter
--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441