----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 1b2ffdbf
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 0546e06b
@REPLYADDR Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Jonathan N. Little
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: -0400
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64;
rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.17
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Mark Bourne wrote:
>
> However, a couple of years ago I did have an issue with a couple of
> disks that I`d been using with a USB-SATA adapter, which then couldn`t
> be read when attached directly to the PC`s SATA bus. It turns out that
> some USB-SATA adapters misreport the logical block size used by the disk
> (seems to be an issue with a commonly used chipset).
It can depend on the size of the drive. I have external drive docks for
coping and moving data on drives. My older dual Orico will handle up to
2TB drives but for larger drives I had to get a newer one. I have some
little USB-SATA dongles, one I use with a little PI server, but these
seem to have the older drive limit. All is dependent in the controller
chip used.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.17
* Origin: LITTLE WORKS STUDIO (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441