----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <klrrs9F2kepU1@mid.individual.net>
5f96544e
@REPLY:
14@foxmccloud45.eternal-september.org> 61bd1f38
@REPLYADDR Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mike Easter
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<klrrs9F2kepU1@mid.individual.net>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<B92cnYbUzJC2x2X5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> 1@dont-email.me>
14@foxmccloud45.eternal-september.org>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Fox McCloud45 wrote:
> Switching from a tightly-controlled Arch Linux installation to a "bloated"
> Ubuntu Unity one feels weird but for some reason I don`t dislike it. I may
> really be losing sanity.
That`s an example of a DE `winning you over`.
As far as I know, Ub is the `best` way to use Unity, just like LM or
LMDE are the best ways to use Cinnamon DE, as those dev/s are the most
`committed` to that DE.
I will say that there are some other nice Cinnamons too :-) Not so many
Unity/s.
--
Mike Easter
--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441