----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 8@dont-email.me> 1f96b673
@REPLY:
<MPG.3f8145aa134c7be46ac@news.eternal-september.org> 11594f49
@REPLYADDR Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Alan
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 8@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References:
<MPG.3f801d7bca5e9bf6a1@news.eternal-september.org> <MPG.3f81669252d3558a5d@news.eternal-september.org>
<MPG.3f8145aa134c7be46ac@news.eternal-september.org>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: Mozilla Thunderbird
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 2023-09-29 19:36, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:56:56 +0100, Alan LeHun says...
>
>>
>> In article <
MPG.3f801d7bca5e9bf6a1@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>
al@aohell.com says...
>>
>>> It`s
>>> 0.04 percent. It`s gone up from 0.03 over the last couple decades.
>>>
>>
>> That`s a 33% increase, right?
>
> When you`re talking infinitesimal numbers, ANY increase may seem GINORMOUS.
>
> It`s like the idiot bogan from Arsetralia who seems to think we can feel a
> millionth of a degree, so when it goes up 2 millionths, he has a fucking
> orgasm. SEE? WARMING!
>
> 1-1/100th of a percent. I don`t care if it was a 99% increase... infinitesimal
> is infinitesimal.
You really ARE innumerate, aren`t you?
--- Mozilla Thunderbird
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441