@MSGID: 1:229/426 8C51E1E3
@REPLY: 1:340/1101 012c2848
On 11 Jun 23  04:44:00, Shurato said the following to Joe Phigan:

S> Websockify.  That worked great and supported the SSL certificate.  Now
S> everything except for ftelnet itself is run internally through SSL.  I`m sur
S> people will feel a lot more comfortable now, if they care about their BBS
S> traffic being sniffed (which is rather unlikely to happen, or cause anything
S> to be concerned about if it were to occur).

This topic comes up every few years or so and sometimes ends up a wildly silly
debate on the secure-factor... for a technology never designed for it.

If someone wants to jump through hoops to get SSL working for a BBS thats
fine, but no caller I`ve ever encountered in 30+ years ever cared about the
encryption of the connection.

Atreyu

--- Renegade vY2Ka2
 * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 50/109 103/705 116/116 120/616
123/0 10 25 126 170 180
SEEN-BY: 123/200 755 3001 124/5016 135/115 300
153/757 7715 154/10 30 40 50
SEEN-BY: 154/700 203/0 220/90 221/0 6 222/2 226/18
227/201 229/310 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 240/1120 5832 250/1 275/1000 280/464 5003
292/854 299/6 301/1 310/31
SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 396/45 423/120 460/16 58 256
1124 463/68 467/888 633/280
SEEN-BY: 712/848 1321 770/1 2320/105 3634/0 12 27
56 57 119 4500/1 5000/111
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5020/715 846 848 1042
4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5054/30 5061/133 5064/56 5075/128 5083/444
5090/958
@PATH: 229/426 460/58 280/464 154/10 3634/12
5020/1042 4441