----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <ked605FpsphU1@mid.individual.net>
01236767
@REPLY: <9s8gM.975$tol1.585@fx09.iad> f4418bf5
@REPLYADDR Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Andy Burns
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<ked605FpsphU1@mid.individual.net>
@RFC-References:
<1qbffa5.1adff801ndrrcbN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> iS99.3297960@fx16.iad>
<1qbnhi9.3p966e1nlu1yjN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> gGD7.405554@fx11.iad>
<1qbnyg1.11uoqwl1ybtsjsN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <9s8gM.975$tol1.585@fx09.iad>
@TZUTC: 0100
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64;
rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
vallor wrote:
> So is that the last word on these AI shells? I still
> use them, even though the novelty has worn off a bit. (I`d
> still be much more interested if they were "answer machines"
> instead of "say what sounds good" machines. :)
>
> I don`t trust them, but do verify them -- and I recommend
> others do the same.
I don`t use them, though I do notice those people who test them out, or
believe in the answers blindly, also those who used to be paid to
develop them turning against them ... maybe it`ll take a multi-million
dollar lawsuit to make them go away for a decade?
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.11.2
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848 1042
4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128 6078/80
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441