----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: edN3.3447@fx14.iad> 33f3ce7a
@REPLY: <1qd3lj6.49min21fewhz4N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
bcfcb774
@REPLYADDR vallor <vallor@vallor.earth>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 vallor
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<1qd1d50.1ws103omis9arN%snipeco.2@gmail.com><68fnM.1395$Bq67.234@fx13.iad> <1qd3b3i.6a6xj11g336joN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>Bq67.9@fx13.iad>
<1qd3lj6.49min21fewhz4N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
@RFC-Message-ID: edN3.3447@fx14.iad>
@TZUTC: 0000
@PID: Pan/0.154 (Izium; dfc8674
gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 18:03:08 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
> vallor <
vallor@vallor.earth> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:18:09 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
>>
>> > vallor <
vallor@vallor.earth> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:55:49 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > To ChatGPT4: state the formulae for special relativity in haiku form
>> >> >
>> >> > <
https://chat.openai.com/share/4eb78381-d425-466f-8cb1-2717be126c3f>
>> >> >
>> >> > Fail...
>> >>
>> >> I think you may have used the default, which is GPT3.5.
>> >>
>> >> GPT4 did a little bit better, but still has a ways to go for such
>> >> mash-ups:
>> >>
>> >>
https://chat.openai.com/share/6a91480e-926c-4742-80e9-e00e74830fac
>> >>
>> >> _ _ _[ChatGPT4]_ _ _ _
>> >>
>> >> Me:
>> >> state the formula for special relativity in haiku form, please
>> >>
>> >> ChatGPT:
>> >> Speed of light constant,
>> >> Time and space intertwine, warp.
>> >> E equals mc squared.
>> >>
>> >> Me:
>> >> please try again, but constrain the final stanza to 5 syllables. The
>> >> word "is" can be substituted for "equals".
>> >>
>> >> ChatGPT:
>> >> Light speed unwavering,
>> >> In space and time, melding dance,
>> >> E is mc squared.
>> >>
>> >> Me:
>> >> keep the final stanza the same, but the first line has to be shortened
>> >> to 5 syllables, please rewrite that
>> >>
>> >> ChatGPT:
>> >> Light speed stays steadfast,
>> >> In space and time, melding dance,
>> >> E is mc squared.
>> >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>> >>
>> >> Is that any better?
>> >>
>> >>
>> > It`s a pseudo-intelligent child that must have its hand held to get its
>> > answers anywhere near correct. Perhaps it will be more impressive when
>> > it`s grown up a bit.
>>
>> How about _you_ try writing the haiku you want, and see how well _you_
>> do, hmm? ;) Seriously, it`s like you`re strangling it, then complaining
>> that it chokes.
>>
>> I`ve found it really good at creative brainstorm type tasks. I don`t
>> think you`ve given it enough of a chance.
>>
>
> A chance at what? Is it meant to be useful or is it
> a generator of artistic (heh) verbal burble? I gave
> it a task and it failed repeatedly.
>
> Verbal burble ensues - skip to end
>
>> _ _ _[ GPT4 ]_ _ _ _
>>
>> User
>> please write a description of special relativity in iambic pentameter
>>
>> ChatGPT
>> When space and time as one unite,
>> In Einstein`s vision, pure and bright,
>> This world, it tells a tale so vast,
>> In relativity recast.
>>
>> Objects not at rest, we find,
>> Twist the cloth of space and time.
>> Motion seen through different eyes,
>> Time`s own rhythm does revise.
>>
>> And speed of light, it stands supreme,
>> In this world that`s not what seems.
>> Despite our haste, despite our strife,
>> It stays constant in its life.
>>
>> In all frames, no matter which,
>> Light speed shows no preference, glitch.
>> This fact does mean that time must flow,
>> At different rates, this truth we know.
>>
>> The slower ticks the cosmic clock,
>> As speeds approach light`s steadfast rock.
>> A paradox? It may seem so,
>> Yet tests in science make it so.
>>
>> Space contracts, as well it might,
>> As speed of light is reached in flight.
>> An object`s length, in motion`s thrall,
>> To observers seems to fall.
>>
>> This is the truth that Einstein gave,
>> A universe both strange and brave.
>> In every planet, star, and city,
>> Lies the heart of special relativity.
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> For bonus points: If I`m not mistaken,
>> I know of a flaw with Einstein`s elevator analogy:
>>
>> With sensitive enough equipment, you can tell if
>> the elevator is in a gravity field vs. accelerating:
>>
>> In a gravity field, gravity will be less at the top of the elevator car
>> than at the bottom, but it will measure the same in an elevator (or a
>> spacecraft) that is accelerating. ...change my mind! ;)
>>
>
> I wouldn`t dream of trying.
>
> FTR I agree with your gravity thesis, for the local case at least.
Message-ID:
1@dont-email.me>
(I`m pretty sure I`m not the first person to have thought of that.)
--
-v
--- Pan/0.154 (Izium; dfc8674 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
* Origin: blocknews - www.blocknews.net (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848 1042
4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441