----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<8c503661-226d-49fc-bd67-f8edda74d791@ionary.com> 816466f1
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 720d6909
@REPLYADDR Fred Goldstein
<fQRMgoldstein@ionary.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Fred Goldstein
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<8c503661-226d-49fc-bd67-f8edda74d791@ionary.com>
@RFC-References: 2@dont-email.me>
<84933879-8526-4a78-a515-5155cee3261a@ionary.com> 1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: -0400
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 8/24/2023 2:51 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 23.08.2023 schrieb "Fred Goldstein"<
anonymized@ionary.com>:
>
>> SMC is asking for permission to use up to 50 kHz wide channels
> Multiple of these channels mean no more space for ham radio - or is my
> guess wrong?
They are not using proposing to use ham radio frequencies. They are
proposing a set of frequencies already authorized for use under Part 90
licenses. But those frequencies are normally only available for
commercial use on an emergency basis. There are several existing data
systems on those bands, however, operating under Part 5 experimental
licenses. Some of these bands are adjacent to ham bands, though, so the
out-of-band signals from transmitters operating under SMC`s proposed
rules would be "S9+" on parts of the ham bands.
BTW, Digest readers should remember that you can contribute by submitting to
telecomdigestsubmissions@telecom-digest.org
A plain "reply" might go to the wrong address.
--
Fred Goldstein k1io fred "at" ionary.com
--- FIDOGATE 5.12-ge4e8b94
* Origin: The Telecom Digest (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441