----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<f278811b-e8d5-453e-800d-ccc939db65b7n@googlegroups.com> 7abb0b22
@REPLY:
<5b1fd710-60a3-4589-b189-bb80d1987519n@googlegroups.com> b3b3bb4f
@REPLYADDR Hans Bezemer
<the.beez.speaks@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Hans Bezemer
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<6363a6bb-7a1a-4289-9883-d4e9b5569a3e@googlegroups.com> <7829ca3f-be77-4e85-9b3b-7888175ddb18@googlegroups.com>
<4840ada6-9000-435e-a94c-14316451394d@googlegroups.com> <97d4a69e-41d0-4f01-9bf8-c9fda920d961@googlegroups.com>
<77558bd0-77e9-4fcf-9583-9a40eadb899a@googlegroups.com> 1@dont-email.me>
<fa84ccdc-9c06-4b88-9dbe-1ff7edf8a306@googlegroups.com> <c07bdd98-fd72-467d-b9b1-8beec1f479ad@googlegroups.com>
<f6421c00-4be7-433b-9e14-f9292c2ed4a9@googlegroups.com> <5e6a7510.325826043@news.eternal-september.org>
<326cea0e-c960-46db-ae9d-8e0c9489c907@googlegroups.com> <194715b4-52ef-4121-8a3e-f4c30b45098an@googlegroups.com>
<a7acea48-7781-4ad2-bc5b-feca1469d4fan@googlegroups.com> 1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6f01b499-d106-4278-b352-fb37f7c16ec4n@googlegroups.com> <5b1fd710-60a3-4589-b189-bb80d1987519n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<f278811b-e8d5-453e-800d-ccc939db65b7n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 5:32:29 AM UTC+2, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
> On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 3:37:20 AM UTC-7, Hans Bezemer wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 8:27:07 PM UTC+2, Rod Pemberton wrote:
> > > In other words, Hugh must always see himself as the "King of the Hill",
> > > as royalty, as perfect, and in total control, in regards to all things
> > > Forth. All conflict with Hugh shall be repressed, suppressed, and
> > > oppressed, for Hugh is the King! All hail mighty Hugh!
> > That`s true. I can remember a discussion where it was something about
> > "experts". https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/GOPs3a
OtJk/m/DQBjLUJ0BwAJ
> I`m surprised that Hans Bezemer would provide a link to that thread.
> In it I was pointing out that he doesn`t know what Harvard Architecture is,
> but he teaches the subject in his instructional videos.
> I would expect him to be ashamed of this and not want it mentioned.
> He thinks that segmented memory is Harvard Architecture! That is dumb!
> > The point that makes him *really* mad is that I neither care
about labels nor
> > value being the "biggest ape on the hill". The only metric I
find useful is what I
> > can do with what I got upstairs.
> Hans also has an instructional video teaching the subject of implementing
> a string stack, which he doesn`t know how to do. His video provided a
> graphical illustration of swapping two strings --- one string gets copied
> into a pad somewhere, then the other string gets copied to where it was,
> then the string in the pad gets copied to where that string was.
> That was an hilarious video! Hans doesn`t know what COW (copy-on-write)
> is, or know that it is much faster to just swap the pointers to the strings
> rather than swap the entire strings.
> Hans doesn`t have any knowledge "upstairs" --- just a lot of hot
air --- what he
> does with what he has upstairs is make hilariously stupid
instructional videos.
> > Since he is wired completely differently (he is actually
*begging* for validation)
> > it intensely irritates him when somebody is not racing him or
giving him kudos
> > for work he finds extremely important and valuable.
> Hans is still not making any sense.
> If I wanted "validation" I would have stayed on the Forth-200x mailing list
> so my super-duper expert status would be validated by the Forth-200x
> committee. Being on the Forth-200x mailing list is essentially the same
> as having reference letters from Stephen Pelc, Anton Ertl, Bernd Paysan,
> Peter Knaggs, etc., that can be used as validation of Forth expertise.
> The whole point of being on the Forth-200x mailing list is so that,
> in the unlikely case that a job in Forth is offered, the
candidate can explain
> that he is not just a mere Forth programmer, but he sets the standard for
> the entire Forth community. All Forth programmers rely on the Forth-200x
> experts to do their thinking for them! The Forth-200x committee considers
> them to be the elite whose opinion on Forth is valuable. Woo hoo!
> > It is what it is.. What I do value Hugh for is that he`s
actually written Forth code -
> > so that alone IMHO justifies him being here
> There was this thread:
>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/hp1MbSkew08/m/os5OYTOeBAAJ
> Hans said:
>
> On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 7:37:35 AM UTC-7, Hans Bezemer wrote:
> > But maybe now you understand why I don`t care about you, Hugh. Or anything
> > you say about me. Or make me stop what I`m doing. To me,
you`re just a nobody
> > with a crazy opinion I don`t care for.
> >
> > Hans Bezemer
> >
> > BTW, I can rip your NOVICE package till the last byte.
>
> Hans Bezemer appreciates the fact that I have posted Forth source-code
> so he can rip it off (because he can`t write Forth source-code himself),
> but he will still continue to fling insults at me while he is
ripping off my code.
>
> Hans is a typical maintenance programmer --- they are all alike --- they
> require somebody to write the code, then they rip it off and claim
> that they wrote it themselves. Testra employed a string of maintenance
> programmers after I left who claimed to be instant experts in MFX,
> but all of them failed to learn to program in MFX --- maybe Testra will
> hire Hans Bezemer next, as he seems to be their type.
Hugh, I`m always thankful when you dedicate an entire episode of your
famous rants to me. I know this is very therapeutic for you and I sincerily
hope it contributes to your mental health in anyway.
I know this thread has been hard for you. There are still some cognative
dissonance issues to settle. I know you`re convinced to be a very
inventive, clever programmer - but the cold hard truth you slowly start
to accept is that no matter how liberal your license is - if nobody wants
to rip your code, I`d better be a pleasant hobby - and not a profession.
Because that would be delusional.
If I may give you a little advise - use a bit of humor in your roasts! You`ll
be much better apppreciated. And use generally accepted definitions and
concepts. That doesn`t leave an impression of a raving lunatic - I know
you want to avoid that, so that`ll need a little more exercise.
But all in all -
funnier than Lilly Singh, so you`re on the right track.
I think it`s time for your medication now.
Hans Bezemer
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441