----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 5c2c0145
@REPLY:
<f278811b-e8d5-453e-800d-ccc939db65b7n@googlegroups.com> 7abb0b22
@REPLYADDR dxf <dxforth@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 dxf
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References:
<6363a6bb-7a1a-4289-9883-d4e9b5569a3e@googlegroups.com> <7829ca3f-be77-4e85-9b3b-7888175ddb18@googlegroups.com>
<4840ada6-9000-435e-a94c-14316451394d@googlegroups.com> <97d4a69e-41d0-4f01-9bf8-c9fda920d961@googlegroups.com>
<77558bd0-77e9-4fcf-9583-9a40eadb899a@googlegroups.com> 1@dont-email.me>
<fa84ccdc-9c06-4b88-9dbe-1ff7edf8a306@googlegroups.com> <c07bdd98-fd72-467d-b9b1-8beec1f479ad@googlegroups.com>
<f6421c00-4be7-433b-9e14-f9292c2ed4a9@googlegroups.com> <5e6a7510.325826043@news.eternal-september.org>
<326cea0e-c960-46db-ae9d-8e0c9489c907@googlegroups.com> <194715b4-52ef-4121-8a3e-f4c30b45098an@googlegroups.com>
<a7acea48-7781-4ad2-bc5b-feca1469d4fan@googlegroups.com> 1@gioia.aioe.org>
<6f01b499-d106-4278-b352-fb37f7c16ec4n@googlegroups.com> <5b1fd710-60a3-4589-b189-bb80d1987519n@googlegroups.com>
<f278811b-e8d5-453e-800d-ccc939db65b7n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: 1100
@PID: Mozilla Thunderbird
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 1/10/2023 8:39 am, Hans Bezemer wrote:
> On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 5:32:29 AM UTC+2, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
>> On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 3:37:20 AM UTC-7, Hans Bezemer wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 8:27:07 PM UTC+2, Rod Pemberton wrote:
>>>> In other words, Hugh must always see himself as the "King of the Hill",
>>>> as royalty, as perfect, and in total control, in regards to all things
>>>> Forth. All conflict with Hugh shall be repressed, suppressed, and
>>>> oppressed, for Hugh is the King! All hail mighty Hugh!
>>> That`s true. I can remember a discussion where it was something about
>>> "experts".
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/GOPs3a_OtJk/m/DQBjLUJ0BwAJ
>> I`m surprised that Hans Bezemer would provide a link to that thread.
>> In it I was pointing out that he doesn`t know what Harvard Architecture is,
>> but he teaches the subject in his instructional videos.
>> I would expect him to be ashamed of this and not want it mentioned.
>> He thinks that segmented memory is Harvard Architecture! That is dumb!
>>> The point that makes him *really* mad is that I neither care
about labels nor
>>> value being the "biggest ape on the hill". The only metric I
find useful is what I
>>> can do with what I got upstairs.
>> Hans also has an instructional video teaching the subject of implementing
>> a string stack, which he doesn`t know how to do. His video provided a
>> graphical illustration of swapping two strings --- one string gets copied
>> into a pad somewhere, then the other string gets copied to where it was,
>> then the string in the pad gets copied to where that string was.
>> That was an hilarious video! Hans doesn`t know what COW (copy-on-write)
>> is, or know that it is much faster to just swap the pointers to the strings
>> rather than swap the entire strings.
>> Hans doesn`t have any knowledge "upstairs" --- just a lot of
hot air --- what he
>> does with what he has upstairs is make hilariously stupid
instructional videos.
>>> Since he is wired completely differently (he is actually
*begging* for validation)
>>> it intensely irritates him when somebody is not racing him or
giving him kudos
>>> for work he finds extremely important and valuable.
>> Hans is still not making any sense.
>> If I wanted "validation" I would have stayed on the Forth-200x mailing list
>> so my super-duper expert status would be validated by the Forth-200x
>> committee. Being on the Forth-200x mailing list is essentially the same
>> as having reference letters from Stephen Pelc, Anton Ertl, Bernd Paysan,
>> Peter Knaggs, etc., that can be used as validation of Forth expertise.
>> The whole point of being on the Forth-200x mailing list is so that,
>> in the unlikely case that a job in Forth is offered, the
candidate can explain
>> that he is not just a mere Forth programmer, but he sets the standard for
>> the entire Forth community. All Forth programmers rely on the Forth-200x
>> experts to do their thinking for them! The Forth-200x committee considers
>> them to be the elite whose opinion on Forth is valuable. Woo hoo!
>>> It is what it is.. What I do value Hugh for is that he`s
actually written Forth code -
>>> so that alone IMHO justifies him being here
>> There was this thread:
>>
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/hp1MbSkew08/m/os5OYTOeBAAJ
>> Hans said:
>>
>> On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 7:37:35 AM UTC-7, Hans Bezemer wrote:
>>> But maybe now you understand why I don`t care about you, Hugh. Or anything
>>> you say about me. Or make me stop what I`m doing. To me,
you`re just a nobody
>>> with a crazy opinion I don`t care for.
>>>
>>> Hans Bezemer
>>>
>>> BTW, I can rip your NOVICE package till the last byte.
>>
>> Hans Bezemer appreciates the fact that I have posted Forth source-code
>> so he can rip it off (because he can`t write Forth source-code himself),
>> but he will still continue to fling insults at me while he is
ripping off my code.
>>
>> Hans is a typical maintenance programmer --- they are all alike --- they
>> require somebody to write the code, then they rip it off and claim
>> that they wrote it themselves. Testra employed a string of maintenance
>> programmers after I left who claimed to be instant experts in MFX,
>> but all of them failed to learn to program in MFX --- maybe Testra will
>> hire Hans Bezemer next, as he seems to be their type.
>
> Hugh, I`m always thankful when you dedicate an entire episode of your
> famous rants to me. I know this is very therapeutic for you and I sincerily
> hope it contributes to your mental health in anyway.
>
> I know this thread has been hard for you. There are still some cognative
> dissonance issues to settle. I know you`re convinced to be a very
> inventive, clever programmer - but the cold hard truth you slowly start
> to accept is that no matter how liberal your license is - if nobody wants
> to rip your code, I`d better be a pleasant hobby - and not a profession.
> Because that would be delusional.
Well, licenses in a hobby situation are rather delusional too. Hobbies
are supposed to be about fun - not ownership.
--- Mozilla Thunderbird
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441