@MSGID:
<496d999e-9a6e-4f5c-86f6-b8438f3e7948n@googlegroups.com> 00882e16
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 7ff28f79
@REPLYADDR gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 gah4
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<496d999e-9a6e-4f5c-86f6-b8438f3e7948n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 2:37:28 AM UTC-7, db wrote:
> Is there a good C++ converter to Fortran? 

There might be some work on C to Fortran conversion.
(Maybe not enough to qualify as "good", though.)

The OO extensions to Fortran are more recent, and though they are
being implemented in compilers, maybe not completely debugged yet.
That would complicate the conversion of OO C++ to OO Fortran.

The actual design of the object-oriented parts of the two language
are not especially close, either. 


--- G2/1.0
 * Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441