----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<149cb9af-8fc6-42f1-8133-9446875657f6n@googlegroups.com> 1ee2d6a9
@REPLY:
<be249762-6f1d-4b0d-8c37-bfd262721bd8n@googlegroups.com> 3a24e025
@REPLYADDR gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 gah4
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<f8466a68-55d1-4d8c-a607-5c41c85404d2n@googlegroups.com> <4d061409-7c22-4e8c-a020-6e4476e8f165n@googlegroups.com>
<be249762-6f1d-4b0d-8c37-bfd262721bd8n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<149cb9af-8fc6-42f1-8133-9446875657f6n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 12:37:16 AM UTC-7, Farzad Tatar wrote:
(snip, I wrote)
> > Set TEST2 to an identity matrix, and so the solution will be the inverse.
> Since the dimensions are not the same, i.e., I don`t have two
columns of unknowns, this solution will not help.
You can have any number of columns of unknowns (greater than zero).
So, with a test2(2,2), you could have two columns and set nrhs to 2.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441