----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <prm+jxSUkmfDZ+qjv@bongo-ra.co> 33de88b2
@REPLY:
2404926c
@REPLYADDR Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Spiros Bousbouras
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: <prm+jxSUkmfDZ+qjv@bongo-ra.co>
@RFC-References:
<20230826125020.141@kylheku.com>
<e1jFR1e0dJXio6H8+@bongo-ra.co>
@TZUTC: -0000
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:37:50 +0200
albert@cherry.(none) (albert) wrote:
> In article <
e1jFR1e0dJXio6H8+@bongo-ra.co>,
[...]
> I have no requirements for lisp. The MAL challenge is not to
> implement a lisp, but use a particular language (Forth FORTRAN C
> python go list-this lisp-that) to investigate the strong and weak
> side of the implementation language for implementing it.
> The attraction of the MAL side is that it has step-by-step
> test driven development. Skipping MAL features is just cheating.
[...]
> I have done a lisp in Forth
>
https://github.com/albertvanderhorst/forthlisp
Then what`s the point of doing MAL ? Just to compare your code with that
by other people in other languages ?
--- FIDOGATE 5.12-ge4e8b94
* Origin: To protect and to server (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441