----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <1ov1gitjdbg5fipmb8gvto6ag3ft8lhpg6@4ax.com>
dc983822
@REPLY:
749d9f00
@REPLYADDR George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 George Neuner
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<1ov1gitjdbg5fipmb8gvto6ag3ft8lhpg6@4ax.com>
@RFC-References:
<769eadf4-96c0-4632-b1c8-8117d20567c7n@googlegroups.com>
<20230911125054.179@kylheku.com>
@TZUTC: -0400
@PID: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:09:33 +0200, albert@cherry.(none) (albert)
wrote:
>In article <
20230911125054.179@kylheku.com>,
>Kaz Kylheku <
864-117-4973@kylheku.com> wrote:
>>On 2023-09-11, Tom Russ <
taruss@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Now, the IF statement works differently. It will treat any
value except FALSE
>>> or NIL as being true. https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/if
>>
>>That looks like a giant clusterfuck.
>
>What is a `clusterfuck`? What do you mean by this?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clusterfuck
--- ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441