----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: xMqa.465824@fx12.iad>
d9d3e529
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> c95b791c
@REPLYADDR rdh <rdh@tilde.institute>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 rdh
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References: <3575679816@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet>
<slrnufjhfc.2ek.matt@imladris.colo.ub3rgeek.net> 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-Message-ID:
xMqa.465824@fx12.iad>
@TZUTC: -0500
@PID: Mozilla Thunderbird
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 9/7/23 11:24, The Real Bev wrote:
> Google may have a lot to answer for, but it was originally the absolute
> best search engine and deserved its popularity. Now it throws up a lot
> of trash before you find anything even close to what you`re looking for,
> but is there anything actually better?
Depending on what you`re looking for, DuckDuckGo might offer better
results, but barely. Search is kind of dead, thanks to all of the
blogspam out there gaming the system.
--
~rdh
--- Mozilla Thunderbird
* Origin: U (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441