----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 82f50b7d
@REPLY: xMqa.465824@fx12.iad>
d9d3e529
@REPLYADDR The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 The Real Bev
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: <3575679816@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet>
<slrnufjhfc.2ek.matt@imladris.colo.ub3rgeek.net> 1@dont-email.me> xMqa.465824@fx12.iad>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.12.1
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 9/7/23 2:51 PM, rdh wrote:
> On 9/7/23 11:24, The Real Bev wrote:
>> Google may have a lot to answer for, but it was originally the absolute
>> best search engine and deserved its popularity. Now it throws up a lot
>> of trash before you find anything even close to what you`re looking for,
>> but is there anything actually better?
>
> Depending on what you`re looking for, DuckDuckGo might offer better
> results, but barely. Search is kind of dead, thanks to all of the
> blogspam out there gaming the system.
That`s why we still have brains. Some of us, anyway.
--
Cheers, Bev
"When your enemies are making mistakes, don`t interrupt them."
-- from the film `Moneyball`
--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.12.1
* Origin: None, as usual (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441