----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 10@dont-email.me> ef41dbe2
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 7fa62b57
@REPLYADDR Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Marco Moock
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 10@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References:
<6510ba28@news.ausics.net>1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: 0200
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Am 24.09.2023 um 20:16:35 Uhr schrieb candycanearter07:
> On 9/24/23 17:37, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
> > Basically any multiprocessor CPU chip of reasonable sophistication
> > produced today -- i.e., desktop and server CPUs, and probably
> > smartphone SoCs for that matter, also has an entire "backstage
> > cast" of ancillary support cores keeping things running correctly.
> > Some of these mainly handle the boot process, and we`re more
> > likely to know about these (e.g. Intel ME/AMD PSP), but even less
> > known are "backstage" cores which don`t participate in the boot
> > process but which are instead involved in things like power and
> > thermal regulation." ...
> >
>
> Company secrecy is so frustrating sometimes.
Intel ME had serious security issues in the past. If people really know
what they do and can proof that, the will maybe never every buy Intel
CPUs because of the security issues.
--- FIDOGATE 5.12-ge4e8b94
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441