----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 249f290a
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 7caa2068
@REPLYADDR candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 candycanearter07
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<0001HW.2AC4F7C5000165137000008C32CF@news.eternal-september.org> 2ph4.111275@fx14.iad>
<0001HW.2AC525D70007CBED7000008C32CF@news.eternal-september.org> 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<0001HW.2AC691B3002E50BA7000006B72CF@news.eternal-september.org> 1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: -0500
@PID: Mozilla Thunderbird
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 9/29/23 00:32, Wally J wrote:
> To be clear, you may not even be aware that only in iOS 16 did iOS _begin_
> to break down that primitive monolith - which I`m not sure you`re aware of.
>
> *About Rapid Security Responses - only available in iOS 16 and up*
> <
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201224>
Wait, they`re *that* recent?
>>
>> Windows employs the same update strategy.
>>
https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=windows+10
>
> You can`t seriously claim, sans a shred of evidence, that Windows is a
> monolith like iOS is a monolith since Microsoft does NOT update
> Windows as the primitive stone-age monolithic package that Apple uses.
>
Plus they have a better security update policy.
> How do most Windows users get their updated drivers, for example?
> *You do know they don`t generally come from Microsoft, right?*
>
> Where do you think the iOS drivers come from?
To be fair, Apple is the only company making iOS compatible devices.
Still is frustrating they don`t separate the updates, though.
>
> Quite different from Apple`s monolithic update mechanism, Android has
> Project Treble with Qualcomm where the drivers are asynchronously
> updated irrespective of the carrier and the Android release process.
laboration-extend-android-os-support-and>
>
> Likewise, are you aware how major applications on Windows and Android
> update? Again, nothing like that of the primitive monolithic method Apple
> uses.
>
> You can`t be oblivious that with Apple - it`s everything - or nothing.
> With every other operating system - the updates are in many layers.
>
> With iOS, you instantly lose full support the moment a next release ships!
> *Distinguishing software updates from upgrades*
>
>
> It`s fine that Apple uses a stone-age primitive update mechanism - which is
> Apple`s prerogative - but it`s the main reason iOS has the most zero day
> holes and even more importantly the most exploited zero-day holes.
>
> By far.
"Courage" (sarcastic)
>
>> And the iOS security sandbox model makes it so a compromised app will not be
>> able to screw up the entire rest of your system, like it is so in Android.
>
> WTF? You`ve never heard of the many zero-click zero-day exploits of iOS?
> Are you serious?
>
> Again, we have to get to common ground which is you can`t discount that
> on average, iOS has had one a month (sometimes two or three!) for years!
>
> *You can`t just ignore that iOS has been extremely insecure* (for years!)
That is *way* worse than I expected, geezus.
--
user is generated from /dev/urandom
--- Mozilla Thunderbird
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441