----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 772deab0
@REPLY: <knobt2Frr8mU6@mid.individual.net>
ded89729
@REPLYADDR Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Wally J
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 1@dont-email.me>
<xn0o7du1wkj59d4003@reader443.eternal-september.org> <xn0o7epgyl8qmfx004@reader443.eternal-september.org>
<knobt2Frr8mU6@mid.individual.net>
@TZUTC: -0400
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Jolly Roger <
jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>> Obviously they can`t make any hardware design changes to the iPhone
>> 15, and providing the customers with a new phone will not make any
>> difference if they continue using it the same way. The fix has to be
>> something other than hardware changes.
>
> Convenient since you trolls haven`t shown this to be a hardware issue
First off, the _topic_ is incomprehensible to the uneducated iKooks, which
is that it`s valuable to _predict_ what Apple will do to make people whole.
*Clearly the iPhone 15 is defective* ... but what will Apple do about it?
Those adult predictions of what Apple will do are based on what Apple has
done in the past - which - as we all know - is always to blame the owner.
*You`re holding it wrong!* says Steve Jobs.
However, sometimes Apple blames the technology - even as the only way
Apple`s blame of everything except Apple didn`t hold up in any court.
*The batteries made me do it!* says Tim Cook.
Hence, it`s a valuable _adult endeavor_ to *predict* what Apple will do
(given the long sordid history of what Apple has done in the past).
For example, has Apple ever acted with the customers` interest in mind?
--- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441