----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<ee8b01c3204a3e9c09a97bd6c6777fec559471e0.camel@munted.eu> ce06562e
@REPLY: 4@news.misty.com> a0d8ce7a
@REPLYADDR Single Stage to Orbit
<alex.buell@munted.eu>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Single Stage to Orbit
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<ee8b01c3204a3e9c09a97bd6c6777fec559471e0.camel@munted.eu>
@RFC-References:
<memo.20230924151040.16292R@jgd.cix.co.uk> <944e6c54-4d47-4bf8-a1c5-736f594cac9cn@googlegroups.com>
<mddpm24d1ty.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <7w5y3wjepw.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> 1@reader2.panix.com>
1@news.misty.com> <7wpm22j0bh.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> 4@news.misty.com>
@RFC-Reply-To: alex.buell@munted.eu
@TZUTC: 0100
@PID: Evolution 3.48.4
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 12:58 +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> There were of course development, and testing done between machines
> and so on. But that was not "ARPANET". ARPANET was running NCP until
> flag day, when it officially switched to IP. And at some point after
> that, all of ARPANET because just the 10.* addresses on the Internet,
> and then ARPANET was turned off, and it was decided that 10.* should
> not exist on the Internet anymore...
That 10.* address range still lives on in private networks to this very
day. Hadn`t realised until now that ARPAnet actually had that address
range.
--
Tactical Nuclear Kittens
--- Evolution 3.48.4
* Origin: One very high maintenance cat (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441