@MSGID:
<fdc7fc08-e3d7-4fb7-ad93-f7cb6118a55en@googlegroups.com> dd4624b7
@REPLY: 6@news.misty.com> 7c99dc1a
@REPLYADDR gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 gah4
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<memo.20230924151040.16292R@jgd.cix.co.uk> <944e6c54-4d47-4bf8-a1c5-736f594cac9cn@googlegroups.com>
<mddpm24d1ty.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <7w5y3wjepw.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> 1@reader2.panix.com>
1@news.misty.com> <7wpm22j0bh.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> 4@news.misty.com>
<7wh6nehycy.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> 6@news.misty.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<fdc7fc08-e3d7-4fb7-ad93-f7cb6118a55en@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 2:43:28 PM UTC-7, Johnny Billquist wrote:

(snip)

> You would basically have to have two different parallel networks, and 
> them you might have some machines that would act as gateway between the 
> two networks. 

I don`t remember back to NCP, but I do remember exactly that
for DECnet and TCP/IP. There were gateways that would transfer
mail between the two.  I believe also some that would allow
remote login between the two.


--- G2/1.0
 * Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441