@MSGID:
<4f246eeb-25e7-4ebd-b095-7fba51454ffbn@googlegroups.com> 821ece0f
@REPLY: 1@solani.org> d7a7fca7
@REPLYADDR Mike Spangler <mspangler@ifiber.tv>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mike Spangler
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<b1851b43-77c6-4887-8690-c2f891d4cbc1n@googlegroups.com> <09603b77-1953-4742-b400-268c6e457e9cn@googlegroups.com>
1@dont-email.me> <577f6d17-245b-4e4c-a56a-3f062366a690n@googlegroups.com>
1@solani.org>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<4f246eeb-25e7-4ebd-b095-7fba51454ffbn@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:26:57 AM UTC-7, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> > The debate that I expect will engage scholars for generations is 
> > "CiderPress II" vs. "CiderPress 2" vs. "CiderPress ][".
> ... or "CiderPress //" ;-) 
> 
> Regards, 
> Oliver
--- G2/1.0
 * Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441