----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 4a1046bc
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> daa61b82
@REPLYADDR Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mikko
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 3@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: 0300
@PID: Unison/2.2
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 2023-08-14 14:01:14 +0000, olcott said:
> My point is that the correct behavior to measure is the *input* D
> correctly simulated by H. For this simulation to be correct it must
> account for the pathological relationship between D and H.
Looks like an unjusufied minorty opinion. The really correct thing
to measure is what the problem statement requires to be measured.
> The makes the behavior of D correctly simulated by H different than
> the behavior of of the *non input* D(D) directly executed in main().
If the beharioour of the simulated D(D) is different from the behaviour
of real D(D) then the it is not correctly simulated.
Mikko
--- Unison/2.2
* Origin: - (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848
1042 4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441