----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<755767dd-c4f6-425e-a71d-38de42064acen@googlegroups.com> ea7a6fa2
@REPLY: SuUf.772249@fx14.iad>
0fc05830
@REPLYADDR Jeffrey Rubard
<jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Jeffrey Rubard
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<865bc1f2-ae48-48cb-8140-4fb96fb33eeen@googlegroups.com> xMqa.162772@fx12.iad>
<6f144545-d915-436d-b90d-a610ae747dfcn@googlegroups.com> SuUf.772249@fx14.iad>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<755767dd-c4f6-425e-a71d-38de42064acen@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:54:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 9/2/23 11:43 AM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 1:24:35 PM UTC-4, Richard Damon wrote:
> >> On 8/26/23 1:11 PM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
> >>> Program 1 returns a Boolean value call it A.
> >>> Program 2 returns a Boolean value call it B.
> >>> We want one program that returns A ^ B (the value of A and B).
> >>> We don`t want to call 1 and 2.
> >>> We want to take the code in these two programs and create a new program.
> >>>
> >>> Assume we have the common commands and expression elements
e.g. those of PHP.
> >>> How many different programs can we create?
> >>>
> >>> C-B
> >> A fundamental property of programming is that you can create an infinite
> >> variation of programs that achieve a given goal. At least as long as the
> >> requirements are written semantically (this is the result we need to
> >> generate) and not with syntactic limits (it must be written this way).
> >>
> >> THough you have a syntactic restriction in your definition (we can`t
> >> "call" A or B, since you can always replace a call to a function with
> >> the code for that function, and you specified we have the code, we can
> >> use this property.
> >>
> >> Now, the question comes down to terminology, if you have multipe ways of
> >> implementing a given algorithm, are they all "one program", or is each
> >> implementation consider a different program.
> >>
> >> Normal terminology calls them diferent programs, so your answer
is infinite.
> >>
> >> There may be a finite (but large) practical limit established by the
> >> language you express the program in, and the machine it will be run on.
> > I said use common programming language constructs e.g. PHP. As
you create alternatives, you start to see the difference between
algorithm and implementation.
> > Perhaps the simplest way is 3 parts. Assuming variable name
conflicts are removed:
> > 1. The code for A but save the value returned in variable A.
> > 2. The code for B but save the value returned in variable B.
> > 3. return A&&B
> >
> > There ae LOTS more.
> >
> > C-B
> Which is basically what I said.
"Clap, clap, clap."
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441