----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<526a1e7f-fd5d-4b7f-8bff-14b75ae300bfn@googlegroups.com> f07e24a3
@REPLY:
<c4e359cb-7736-4f5a-85bc-308e57bfa9ddn@googlegroups.com> ea0bff81
@REPLYADDR Jeffrey Rubard
<theleasthappyfella@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Jeffrey Rubard
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<865bc1f2-ae48-48cb-8140-4fb96fb33eeen@googlegroups.com> xMqa.162772@fx12.iad>
<6f144545-d915-436d-b90d-a610ae747dfcn@googlegroups.com> SuUf.772249@fx14.iad>
<755767dd-c4f6-425e-a71d-38de42064acen@googlegroups.com> <c4e359cb-7736-4f5a-85bc-308e57bfa9ddn@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<526a1e7f-fd5d-4b7f-8bff-14b75ae300bfn@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 1:05:54 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 11:06:19 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 3:54:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > On 9/2/23 11:43 AM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 1:24:35 PM UTC-4, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > >> On 8/26/23 1:11 PM, Charlie-Boo wrote:
> > > >>> Program 1 returns a Boolean value call it A.
> > > >>> Program 2 returns a Boolean value call it B.
> > > >>> We want one program that returns A ^ B (the value of A and B).
> > > >>> We don`t want to call 1 and 2.
> > > >>> We want to take the code in these two programs and
create a new program.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Assume we have the common commands and expression
elements e.g. those of PHP.
> > > >>> How many different programs can we create?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> C-B
> > > >> A fundamental property of programming is that you can
create an infinite
> > > >> variation of programs that achieve a given goal. At
least as long as the
> > > >> requirements are written semantically (this is the result we need to
> > > >> generate) and not with syntactic limits (it must be written this way).
> > > >>
> > > >> THough you have a syntactic restriction in your definition (we can`t
> > > >> "call" A or B, since you can always replace a call to a function with
> > > >> the code for that function, and you specified we have the code, we can
> > > >> use this property.
> > > >>
> > > >> Now, the question comes down to terminology, if you have
multipe ways of
> > > >> implementing a given algorithm, are they all "one program", or is each
> > > >> implementation consider a different program.
> > > >>
> > > >> Normal terminology calls them diferent programs, so your
answer is infinite.
> > > >>
> > > >> There may be a finite (but large) practical limit established by the
> > > >> language you express the program in, and the machine it
will be run on.
> > > > I said use common programming language constructs e.g.
PHP. As you create alternatives, you start to see the difference between
algorithm and implementation.
> > > > Perhaps the simplest way is 3 parts. Assuming variable
name conflicts are removed:
> > > > 1. The code for A but save the value returned in variable A.
> > > > 2. The code for B but save the value returned in variable B.
> > > > 3. return A&&B
> > > >
> > > > There ae LOTS more.
> > > >
> > > > C-B
> > > Which is basically what I said.
> > "Clap, clap, clap."
> Wider World: This is some of the worst `claptrap` I have ever seen.
The people "fooled" are primarily themselves, and that`s unfortunate.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441