@MSGID: 1@news.xmission.com>
f4f6c44b
@REPLY: AsA.196497@fx18.iad>
a7c0c18e
@REPLYADDR Kenny McCormack
<gazelle@shell.xmission.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Kenny McCormack
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
1@news.xmission.com>
@RFC-References:
<9e7a4bd1-bfbb-4df7-af1a-27ca9625e50bn@googlegroups.com> <87lee55t51.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
1@news.xmission.com> AsA.196497@fx18.iad>
@TZUTC: -0000
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
In article AsA.196497@fx18.iad>,
Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:
>gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:
>>In article <87lee55t51.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>,
>>Rainer Weikusat  <rweikusat@talktalk.net> wrote:
>>...
>>>It`s  not written  in  a language  whose  extremely complicate  runtime
>>>system that`s  conjectured to  be bug  free in  this respect  by Really
>>>Wishful Thinking[tm] is supposed to prevent simple memory access errors
>>>C supports.
>>
>>What language was this quoted paragraph written in?
>>
>>Preumably one in which word order doesn`t matter.
>
>Word order in German and English don`t always agree.
>
>Basically he is saying, somewhat mockingly, that because it is
>not written in Rust, sudo written in C is inherently memory unsafe.

OK, thanks.

I am glad that you were able to intuit that "Rust" was "the other language"
involved in the comparison.

-- 
They say compassion is a virtue, but I don`t have the time!

    - David Byrne -

--- trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 * Origin: The official candy of the new Millennium (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441