----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<e362e925-4d0c-4592-849e-da53257703d3n@googlegroups.com> 66851e25
@REPLY:
<a2076c08-a29c-4347-ab92-930d018a58d2n@googlegroups.com> c7988b4d
@REPLYADDR Rick Hohensee
<presidentbyamendment@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Rick Hohensee
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<a2076c08-a29c-4347-ab92-930d018a58d2n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<e362e925-4d0c-4592-849e-da53257703d3n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 8:58:57 PM UTC-4,
hongy...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi here,
>
> Is bash a Turing-complete language, and if so, how to validate
this by a minimal example?
>
> Regards,
> Zhao
bash can`t input binary data. C strings can`t contain a 0. See my
use of od to get around that in my subsequent post last night about
Bit Banging Bash
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441