@MSGID: 2:221/6.0 665f2592
@REPLY: 2:221/6.0 665ec9b2
@PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20240505
@NOTE: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30;
i686-pc-mingw32)
@CHRS: CP437 1
@TZUTC: 0300
@TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02
Alexander Koryagin:

AK> The comma before "and" is just an unnecessary thing that
AK> provides anything to make the understanding more clear.

Above I wrote /why/ the Oxford comma is necessary for the
clariy, unambiguity, and regularity of the enumeration.
You, on the other hand, do not disclose your arguments...

AK> With the same success you canput "and" before every
AK> comma in the list. ;-)

Don`t you think it will make the list structure ugly and
redundant?

--- 
 * Origin: nntp://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
SEEN-BY: 50/109 153/757 154/10 218/840 221/1 6 360
250/25 301/1 335/364
SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 450/1024 463/68 467/888 3634/12
5000/111 5001/100 5005/49
SEEN-BY: 5015/42 46 5019/40 5020/715 830 846 848
1042 4441 12000 5022/128
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 1474 1900 5053/51 5054/8
5058/104 5060/900 5061/133
SEEN-BY: 5075/128 5083/1 444
@PATH: 221/6 5020/1042 4441