----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 2:280/5555 69b7ca9e
@REPLY: 14189.fido_fidonews@1:135/115 2e1ccddd
@TID: FMail-W32 2.3.0.1-B20240319
@RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
@TZUTC: 0100
@CHRS: CP850 2
Hello Dan,
On Sunday March 15 2026 20:44, you wrote to me:
MvV>> Consider this: Not only is 2:2/29 in violation of P4, it also is
MvV>> incomplient with the FTSC standards. In particular FTS-5000.005.
MvV>> So what we see is that in order to "save" the FTSC the FTSC
MvV>> standard is violated. Instigated by the IC/ZC2. Hold on to that
MvV>> thought...
DC> Yeah, none of that makes any logical sense. Makes one wonder about
DC> "ulterior motives". Why save an organization that is ignored any way?
I don`t know about the "ulterior motives" but ineed, why save a paper tiger?
[..]
DC> Yea I can see that as being a real motivation-killer.
It was and for me still is indeed.
MvV>> Just my EUR 0,02.
MvV>> *1) By the IC - without any consultation with the Fidonet
MvV>> community - who introduced the so called MOB nodes by decree.
MvV>> And forcing RCs to accept and process nodelist segments in
MvV>> violation of FTS-5000.
DC> Wow. That`s pretty disturbing. Not even sure what MOB nodes are,
Something like this:
,865,Lucas_Visions,Mortsel,Luc_Sienaert,-Unpublished-,300,U,MOB
See also my article in Fidonews 36:43 [01/07]
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin:
http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)
SEEN-BY: 50/109 203/0 280/464 5003 5555 292/854
301/1 450/1024 452/166 463/68
SEEN-BY: 5000/111 5015/46 5020/545 715 830 846
1042 4441 12000 5023/24
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 1474 5053/51 55 58 5060/900
5061/133 5068/45 5075/35
SEEN-BY: 5075/128 5083/444
@PATH: 280/5555 5020/1042 4441