@MSGID: 1:320/219@fidonet 6992cca5
@REPLY: 2:292/854 0e092533
@PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20250409
@CHRS: CP437 2
@TZUTC: -0500
@TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.1.7 (Linux-x86_64)
Hello Ward!

16 Feb 26 05:07, you wrote to Election Coordinator:

 WD> As there is only one candidate, will you require a fully fledged vote?
 WD> Or can we suffice with an FTSC-member (or yourself) putting forward a
 WD> motion to appoint the one candidate? If someone seconds and no-one
 WD> objects (as it would be done in real life) that`s the end of the
 WD> election?

The rules as currently published do not allow this.  With only one candidate, 
it shouldn`t take the RCs long to consider and cast their ballots.

 WD> Just a proposal...

One that must be rejected for this cycle, since the election is already in 
progress.  We can possibly consider something like this in the future.

Andrew
FTSC Election Coordinator

---
 * Origin: From the Desk of the FTSC Administrator (1:320/219)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/37 30/0 50/109 103/705
104/117 106/201 123/130
SEEN-BY: 124/5016 129/215 132/174 142/104 153/757
7001 7715 154/10 30 203/0
SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 229/426 240/1120 2100 5411
5824 5832 5853 5890 6309 261/1
SEEN-BY: 263/1 267/310 275/100 280/464 5003 5006
5555 292/854 8125 301/1 113
SEEN-BY: 310/31 320/119 219 319 2119 322/762
326/101 335/364 341/66 234
SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 509 712/848
770/1 2432/390 2454/119
SEEN-BY: 3634/12 5020/400 545 846 848 1042 4441
12000 5030/49 1081 1474
SEEN-BY: 5053/51 5061/133 5075/128 5083/1 444
6078/80
@PATH: 320/219 240/5832 280/464 301/1 5020/1042
4441