Nп/п : 100 из 100
От : Karel Kral 2:423/39 27 сен 26 06:59:03
К : Eugene Subbotin 27 сен 26 08:15:02
Тема : Re: UTF vs specific
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@REPLY: 2:5075/35@fidonet 6ab14d41
@MSGID: 2:423/39 6ab8a48d
@CHRS: LATIN-2 2
@TZUTC: 0200
@TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.5.1
Hello Eugene!
21 Sep 26 18:28, you wrote to me:
ES> What`s there to wait for? All you need to do in R42 is accept a
ES> document that clearly states that the primary encoding used is UTF-8.
Let say we have bad experience just accepting signed documents since
Munich 1938 ;-) (just joking)
1) coding from Kamicky brothers is better than others (text is
readable even if you do not suppor it) - 2) we (in r42) agreed if
anything we move to utf8 - where old setups which are used are not
compatible. Most of people here.
And honestly? There are not so many people there. Active players
even less. I am happy that we can communicate within region.
Karel
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240209
* Origin: Plast DATA (2:423/39)
SEEN-BY: 103/705 124/5016 153/757 154/10 30 203/0
221/1 6 250 240/1120 5832
SEEN-BY: 263/1 280/464 1043 5003 5006 5555 292/854
8125 301/1 310/31 320/219
SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 396/45 420/19 33 333 421/79
83 423/39 81 120 121 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 5001/100 5015/46
5020/290 570 715 806 1042 1146
SEEN-BY: 5020/8912 5023/24 5030/1081 5034/13 5051/44
5053/58 5057/19 6035/3
@PATH: 423/39 81 221/1 280/464 5555 5020/715