----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
281ccd61
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 636df289
@REPLYADDR Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Wally J
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
1@paganini.bofh.team>
@RFC-References: <knr56nFb112U3@mid.individual.net>
1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: -0400
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
badgolferman <
REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote
> The vague description of the problem will lead to a vague description of
> the solution.
>
> iOS 17 has been installed on my work iPhone 11 and I haven?t noticed any
> problems, but then I only use Outlook to view email.
>
> iOS 16.7 has been installed on my personal iPhone 14 and I will hold out
> for the vague solution to be released.
Hi badgolferman,
If we use our adult cognitive skills and our well-remembered history of
what Apple does to cleverly hide their (repeated) lack of testing...
*A pattern emerges*
Do you see the pattern?
I do.
What`s patently obvious to any adult is Apple forgot to test this latest
device in the real world (which includes Instagram & iOS 17 for example).
Right?
That`s a fact as had they tested it, this never would have happened.
So we have to agree - as adults - Apple didn`t sufficiently test it.
That pattern has already been well established with Apple products.
Need I elaborate?
I hope not.
Now to the blame game that Apple _always_ plays.
*You`re holding it wrong* and "The batteries that made me do it*.
It`s a pattern with Apple to blame everyone but Apple, right?
Well lookey` here.
Apple just blamed a dozen (or so) entities for the problem, right?
Now, here`s the adult question to ask of you (or anyone else)...
*How many of those entities that Apple blamed - did not exist prior?*
The answer is zero, right?
Right?
Every single entity that Apple blamed existed _prior_ to the release!
That`s just a fact.
This means the real problem is as simple as what I`ve proven for years.
*Apple forgot to sufficiently test their design before releasing it*
It`s really that simple, is it not?
Do you agree?
Or disagree?
Why or why not?
--- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
* Origin: To protect and to server (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441