Nп/п : 46 из 100
От : Wilfred van Velzen 2:280/464 02 мар 24 11:49:46
К : All 02 мар 24 13:55:01
Тема : Re: IP only nodes with ICM flag
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 2:280/464 65e304fc
@REPLY: 2:280/5555 5e2f03f0
@TID: FMail-lnx64 2.2.1.1
@RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
@TZUTC: 0100
@CHRS: UTF-8 2
@PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20240209
Hi All,
On 2024-03-02 10:24:15, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to you:
MvdV> The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating
MvdV> nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the
MvdV> POTS/ISDN part.
MvdV> See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
MvdV> The CM flag implies ICM; ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
MvdV> So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
MvdV> This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
There is one less in this list then in the previous list:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,IC
M,XA,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFT,ITN:10123,IVM
Which is strange because it is still in then nodelist with the ICM flag present?
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.2.1.1
* Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 124/5016 153/757 154/30 203/0 221/0 6
240/1120 5832 280/464 5003
SEEN-BY: 280/5555 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 341/66
234 396/45 460/58 467/888
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/400
715 848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 722 1081 5061/133 5075/35 128
5090/958
@PATH: 280/464 5555 5020/1042 4441