----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 8167aa73
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 75c6c46c
@INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3
@REPLYADDR news@druck.org.uk
@REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP
@PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
On 24/11/2024 18:50,
bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
> I`m a little surprised that two interfaces are worse than one.
>
> Has anybody else seen this behavior?
If both interfaces are talking to the same Access point on the same
frequency, it`s going to be worse as WiFi can only talk to one thing at
a time, and the two interfaces will compete for bandwidth.
If you set up the access point with a different SSID for each frequency,
and connect an interface to each, you might get a small amount of
additional bandwidth, but not a much as if you had two 5GHz access
points on different frequencies and SSDs.
---druck
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
SEEN-BY: 50/109 153/757 218/840 840 220/70 221/1 6
360 226/17 100 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 267/800 301/1 113 812 310/31 335/364
341/66 463/68 467/888 633/280
SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 3 100 330 340 772/210 220
230 5005/49 5019/40 5020/715
SEEN-BY: 5020/848 1042 4441 12000 5030/49 722 1081
1474 5053/55 5061/133
SEEN-BY: 5075/128
@PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 5020/1042 4441