@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 55b66f7c
@REPLY:
<slrnvkduch.5ca.news-1513678000@a-tuin.ms.intern> 793f14d2
@INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3
@REPLYADDR news@druck.org.uk
@REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP
@PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
On 27/11/2024 10:50, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> On 2024-11-25, druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
>> If both interfaces are talking to the same Access point on the same
>> frequency, it`s going to be worse as WiFi can only talk to one thing at
>> a time, and the two interfaces will compete for bandwidth.
>
> It`s not different from having two completely separate clients connected to
> the same AP. Unless the channel is fully saturated, the available bandwith
> will be shared between the clients.

Well if you are testing the speed you are saturating, and there will
always be more overhead with two competing clients, than one.

---druck

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
SEEN-BY: 50/109 153/757 218/840 840 220/70 221/1 6
360 226/17 100 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 267/800 301/1 113 812 310/31 335/364
341/66 463/68 467/888 633/280
SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 3 100 330 340 772/210 220
230 5005/49 5019/40 5020/715
SEEN-BY: 5020/848 1042 4441 12000 5030/49 722 1081
1474 5053/55 5061/133
SEEN-BY: 5075/128
@PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 5020/1042 4441