@MSGID: dont-email.me 4956882f
@REPLY: dont-email.me df294fc6
@TZUTC: 1000
@CHRS: CP437 2
@REPLYADDR: ldo@nz.invalid
@REPLYTO: 3:633/280.2@fidonet UUCP
@PID: Pan/0.163 (Kryvyi Rih)
@TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.1.2 (Linux-x86_64)
@RFC-Message-ID: <109t38m$25qlc$6@dont-email.me>
@RFC-From: Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=
<ldo@nz.invalid>
@RFC-References: <109h5bq$309ra$1@dont-email.me>
<wwvy0qru27x.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> sTYlA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<109snd3$21u94$1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
@RFC-Content-Type: text/plain;
@RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
@RFC-Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:57:11
+0000 (UTC)
@RFC-Cancel-Lock:
sha1:wBvjzRdVrufesm5ReA6br6nrKMo=
On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote:

> As Richard says, containers are persistent.

They can be, they need not be. It is entirely possible to mount an 
instance of tmpfs to hold any writable storage, which will disappear as 
soon as the container instance terminates.

--- MBSE BBS v1.1.2 (Linux-x86_64)
 * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
SEEN-BY: 19/10 38 50/109 153/757 218/840 840
220/70 221/1 6 360 226/17 100
SEEN-BY: 229/426 240/1120 267/800 301/1 113 812
310/31 335/364 341/66 463/68
SEEN-BY: 633/280 281 418 420 509 2744 712/848
770/1 3 100 340 350 772/210 220
SEEN-BY: 772/230 5019/40 5020/715 848 1042 4441
12000 5030/49 722 1081 1474
SEEN-BY: 5053/55 5061/133 5075/128
@PATH: 633/280 770/1 218/840 221/6 301/1 5020/1042
4441