----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 0c790ba9
@REPLY:
<49fe2628-d42e-490d-951a-42f212dbeefbn@googlegroups.com> ca41e54b
@REPLYADDR mINE109 <pianoforte109@yahoo.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 mINE109
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References:
<cac927ae-2cdd-4d17-be53-63e1ca20b251n@googlegroups.com> 1@dont-email.me>
<80adae61-17d0-4977-af42-4dcc34f4a24cn@googlegroups.com> 2@dont-email.me>
<49fe2628-d42e-490d-951a-42f212dbeefbn@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0500
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X
10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 9/29/23 10:49 AM, ScottW wrote:
> sailing... sunk.
Tell me about this word pairing. You used it before as if it were some
kind of `sick burn.` Is there a pop culture meaning I missed or is this
just your cleverness at work?
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441